|
|
- SHA1 vs SHA2 vs SHA256 – What’s the difference?
The Secure Hash Algorithm explained One of the most common topics that we field questions on is the Secure Hash Algorithm, sometimes known as SHA1, SHA2, SHA256 Obviously, the different numbers at the end mean something, but there are also misperceptions about what they’re used for, what hashing is and how it all plays into PKI and TLS
- The Difference Between SHA-1, SHA-2 and SHA-256 Hash . . .
Re-Hashed: The Difference Between SHA-1, SHA-2 and SHA-256 Hash Algorithms in Everything Encryption
- DES or 3DES MD5 SHA or SHA1 - Experts Exchange
What are the advantages (other than the obvious) to using DES or 3DES for encryption MD5 or SHA or SHA1 for authentication for VPN's? I'm setting up a 4 location VPN between some clinics to share patient information in a single DB program
- XML-Signature Syntax and Processing
This document has been reviewed by W3C Members and other interested parties and has been endorsed by the Director as a W3C Recommendation It is a stable document and may be used as reference material or cited as a normative reference from another document W3C's role in making the Recommendation is
- OpenSSL Command-Line HOWTO - madboa. com
Introduction The openssl command-line binary that ships with the OpenSSL libraries can perform a wide range of cryptographic operations It can come in handy in scripts or for accomplishing one-time command-line tasks Documentation for using the openssl application is somewhat scattered, however, so this article aims to provide some practical examples of its use
- Cipher Security: How to harden TLS and SSH | Linux Journal
Encryption and secure communications are critical to our life on the Internet Without the ability to authenticate and preserve secrecy, we cannot engage in commerce, nor can we trust the words of our friends and colleagues
- AES Encryption in C# - gutgames. com
James November 30, 2011 11:54 PM I appreciate that we have a "NASA-approved" encryption standard that public can use However, I would like to have a similar but alternate system where I don't need to supply the password (key) each time I want to decrypt the cipher-text
- ssl - Why are Root CAs with SHA1 signatures not a risk . . .
So that article is out of date in my opionion It does not match what Google currently is doing with SHA1 certificates Its not clear if the article has been recently update Q1 2015, lots has changed since then, and I know SHA1 certiicates are being retired by Microsoft which means at least on Windows SHA1 root certificates are indeed effected
|
|
|